Expert Choice Solutions combine collaborative team tools and proven mathematical techniques to enables your team obtain the best decision in reaching a goal. The Expert Choice process lets you: • structure complexity, • measure the importance of competing objectives and alternatives, and • synthesize information, expertise, and judgments • conduct what-if and sensitivity analyses • clearly communicate to share results, and iterate parts of the decision process when necessary • allocate resources (if desired) Upon completion of an Expert Choice evaluation, you and your colleagues will have a thorough, rational, and understandable decision that is intuitively appealing and that can be communicated and justified. A simple AHP Hierarchy This might take the form of (a) choosing an alternative course of action, or (b) allocating resources to a combination (portfolio) of alternatives. The process is iterative and not necessarily one pass through a fixed number of steps. Winrar for mac os x 10.4. The process involves combining logic and intuition with data and judgment based on knowledge and experience. Structuring is the first step in both making a choice of the 'best' (or most preferred) alternative as well as in optimally allocating resources to a combination of alternatives. (Animation will show JUST GREEN BOXES, mimicking the visual brainstorming process, then organizing them into goals, objectives & alternatives). Structuring involves identifying alternative courses of action, identifying objectives (sometimes called criteria) into a hierarchy, determining which objectives each of the alternatives contribute to, and identifying participants and their roles (based on governance considerations where appropriate). After structuring a hierarchy of objectives and identifying alternatives, priorities are derived for relative importance of the objectives as well as the relative preference of the alternatives with respect to the objectives. Originally, all measurement with AHP was performed by pairwise relative comparisons of the elements in each cluster of the hierarchy, taken two elements at a time. For example, if a cluster of objectives consisted of Cost, Performance, Reliability, and Maintenance, judgments would be elicited for the relative importance of each possible pair: Cost vs. Performance, Cost vs. Reliability, Cost vs. Maintenance, Performance vs. Reliability, Performance vs. Maintenance and Reliability vs. Expert Choice AhpExpert Choice Free Download, free expert choice free download software downloads, Page 3. 2: DDD Special; You are a funky warrior of choice, in a funky deep dungeon. And you fight with expert timing! The game will be so addictive that you can try to check. While pairwise relative comparisons are used in AHP and Expert Choice to derive the priorities of the objectives in the objectives hierarchy,AHP and Expert Choice were subsequently modified to incorporate absolute as well as relative measurement for deriving priorities of the alternatives with respect to the objectives. All measures derived with Expert Choice possess the ratio scale levels of measure. If priorities do not possess the ratio level property, as often occurs with other decision methodologies, such as weights and scores in a spreadsheet, the results are likely to be mathematically meaningless. Measurement can be performed by making pairwise relative comparisons, or by using absolute rating scales. Expert Choice allows for subjective as well as objective measurement. This capability makes it somewhat unique in that most mathematical models don't allow for human judgment to the extent possible with AHP and Expert Choice. Furthermore, all measures derived with Expert Choice are 'ratio level measures', an important property that avoids computations that lead to mathematically meaningless results. A synthesis (combining) of the measures according to the objectives hierarchy follows the structuring and measurement steps.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |